|
Document
Index |
|
Table B1 provides a guide to the sensitivity of the forward estimates of expenses and
revenue to variations in economic parameters in 1999-2000. It is important to recognise
that the estimates presented in the table provide only a `rule of thumb' indication of the
impact on the budget of changes in economic and other parameters.
Table B1: Sensitivity of Financial Aggregates to Changes
in Economic Parameters
| 1999-00 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 | |
| $m | $m | $m | $m | |
| Expenses | ||||
| Prices | 270 | 310 | 640 | 480 |
| Wages | 80 | 310 | 360 | 370 |
| Unemployment Benefit Recipients | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Safety Net Adjustment | 60 | 180 | 310 | 390 |
| Revenue | ||||
| Prices | 70 | 240 | 250 | 260 |
| Wages | 1100 | 1020 | 1080 | 1180 |
| Employment | 720 | 670 | 700 | 760 |
| Private Final Demand | 340 | 270 | 280 | 280 |
On the expenses side, the sensitivity analysis of the estimates provides for the following assumptions about changes to four broad groups of parameters:
In addition, about $28 billion of expenses, comprising agency departmental
expenses, other Commonwealth Own Purpose Expenses of a departmental expense nature and
Specific Purpose Payments to the States of a departmental expense nature, are indexed to
weighted averages of movements in underlying inflation and the SNA determined by the AIRC.
The profile of the prices sensitivity has changed when compared to previous analysis. This
is primarily due to the introduction of A New Tax System and its interaction with
financial assistance grants to the States. This has the most impact during the transition
period in 2000-01 and 2001-02. There are also flow-on effects to other accounts (other
than expenses) which are not included in the above analysis.
The number of unemployment benefit recipients, and therefore the total spending on
benefits, is affected by economic growth and employment growth. However, the relationship
between GDP growth and unemployment benefit recipients is highly variable and difficult to
quantify. For this reason, Table B1 only includes the impact of changes in the number
of unemployment benefit recipients (ie Newstart Allowance and unemployed Youth Allowance
recipients) on the estimates.
The assumptions underlying the sensitivity of the revenue estimates to changes in
prices and wages are identical to those used for expenses. In each case, the analysis
presents the estimated effects of change in one economic variable only, and does not
attempt to capture the linkages between economic variables that characterise changes in
the economy more broadly.
The revenue effects of changes in employment and private final demand show the effect of
the following assumptions:
Changes in prices affect revenue through changes in excise revenue. Changes to
arrangements relating to business franchise fee replacement taxes announced in A New
Tax System result in larger changes in excise revenue for a given change in prices
from 2000-01 onwards.
Changes in wages and employment feed through quickly into tax revenue largely through
increases in PAYE tax collections. The personal income tax cuts, which come into effect
from 2000-01, cause some reduction in the sensitivity of revenue to changes in wages and
employment.
Changes in private final demand affect revenue predominantly through changes in sales tax
and excise collections. The abolition of Wholesale Sales Tax from 2000-01 means that
changes in private final demand have a much lower impact on the revenue from that year.