Part IV: Revenue |
Table 11 provides estimates of tax, non-tax and total revenue from 1999-2000 to 2002-03.1 Relative to the 1999-2000 Budget, the MYEFO estimate of total revenue is slightly lower in 1999-2000 but higher in the following three years. Table 11: Estimates of Commonwealth General Government Revenue(a)
(a) All revenue data in this table are produced on a AAS31 basis. All estimates expressed as a proportion of GDP use current MYEFO GDP estimates. There has been a reclassification of revenue since Budget of around $1 billion from tax to non-tax components. Estimates are net of the diesel fuel rebate scheme. The changes to the 1999-2000 Budget estimates (shown in Table 12) incorporate: policy decisions taken since the Budget; a revised assessment of the economic outlook; and actual revenue outcomes up to mid-November 1999. Table 12: Reconciliation of General Government Revenue Estimates(a)
(a) All data in this table are produced on a AAS31 basis unless otherwise specified. Policy decisions subsequent to the 1999-2000 Budget are estimated to reduce revenue marginally in 1999-2000 but increase it significantly in the following years. All revenue policy decisions are listed in Table 13 (and detailed in Appendix A). The main increase in revenue derives from changes to A New Tax System, following agreement with the Australian Democrats to secure legislation in the Senate. In particular, reductions in income tax cuts for income earners over $50,000 and changes to the Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme will together add around $1½ billion to revenue from 2000-01, which partly offsets the expenditure increases from that package. (See Box 2, Part I.) The other major package of tax reform measures is The New Business Tax System. Over the period as a whole, these measures are estimated to be broadly revenue-neutral, with gains to revenue in 2000-01 and 2002-03 slightly more than offsetting losses in the other two years. (See Box 2, Part I.) The temporary Defence East Timor levy, to partially offset the costs of Australias involvement in East Timor, adds $900 million to revenue in 2000-01. (See Box 1, Part I.) Table 13: Revenue Measures since the 1999-2000 Budget(a)(b)
Table 13: Revenue Measures since the 1999-2000 Budget(a)(b) continued
Table 13: Revenue Measures since the 1999-2000 Budget(a)(b) continued
Table 13: Revenue Measures since the 1999-2000 Budget(a)(b) continued
* The nature of this measure is such
that a reliable estimate cannot be provided. As noted, policy decisions since Budget will have little impact on the revenue outlook for 1999-2000. Further, as is evident in Table 12, there is also very little variation in aggregate revenue expected in 1999-2000 from changes in economic parameters and other variations, consistent with the unchanged outlook for nominal GDP growth since Budget. However, this small variation in aggregate revenue relative to Budget comprises some more significant changes to individual revenue categories, as detailed in Table 14. Table 14: General Government Revenue Estimates(a)
(a) All data in this table are produced on a
AAS31 basis. Table 14 shows that, for 1999-2000, net downward revisions to both income tax and indirect tax are largely offset by upward revisions to fringe benefits tax, other taxes and non-tax revenue. Downward revisions have been made to the following revenue items:
Upward revisions to revenue result from the following movements:
Preliminary forecasts for 2000-01 indicate that, in addition to a substantial impact from policy decisions, the aggregate effect of economic parameter and other variations is small, but positive. Once allowance is made for higher prices resulting from changes to indirect taxation, the preliminary forecast for nominal GDP growth in 2000-01 is very similar to Budget projections. Of itself, the economic outlook would thus suggest little need for change to the budget-time estimates. However, there are some other variations which will have important, though largely offsetting, impacts. Tending to boost revenue in 2000-01 (and in subsequent years) is the reclassification since Budget of a portion of the diesel fuel offset to excise as a grant (increasing expenses by an equivalent amount). However, company taxable income growth is likely to remain lower than broader measures of corporate performance and overall macroeconomic indicators would suggest, and a continuing high level of deductible expenditure on information technology upgrades (associated with Y2K and the GST) is expected. Forward projections for revenue in 2001-02 and 2002-03 are higher than presented at Budget due to a combination of the waning of these constraining influences, the ongoing substantial impact of the diesel fuel offset and policy decisions since the Budget. Some further detail on the major categories of revenue is shown in Table 15. Revenue estimates are highly dependent on general economic conditions and the effects of tax policy measures. In particular, taxpayers may respond to new measures in ways which were not fully anticipated at the time the relevant revenue estimates were prepared. Appendix B provides information on the sensitivity of the revenue estimates to changes in economic parameters while Appendix C contains a description of the sources of risks to taxation revenue. Table 15: Forward Estimates of General Government Revenue(a) (a) All data in this table are produced on a AAS31 basis. All estimates expressed as a proportion of GDP use current MYEFO GDP estimates. There has been a reclassification of revenue since Budget of around $1 billion from tax to non-tax components. Total tax also includes Fringe benefits tax and Other taxes. Estimates are net of the diesel fuel rebate scheme. Tax Expenditures Table 16 shows estimates for the period 1995-96 to 2002-03 of aggregate tax expenditures that have been identified and costed in the Tax Expenditures Statement 199798 (TES), which was published in July 1999. The report A New Tax System outlined significant reforms to both expenses and revenues some of which will impact on the costings of tax expenditures. Attachment A of the TES sets out the impacts on the benchmarks that have been incorporated and those that are yet to be incorporated. The New Business Tax System has also introduced significant reforms which will impact on benchmarks against which a tax expenditure is costed. A reassessment of the appropriate benchmarks resulting from reform in the two packages will be undertaken prior to the publication of the next TES. Table 16: Aggregate Tax Expenditures 1995-96 to 2002-03
In analysing the data presented in Table 16, there are a number of considerations that must be kept in mind.
1 All references to 'revenue' in this Part refer to accrual revenue unless explicitly noted otherwise. |