budget.gif (919 bytes)

Document Index
Budget Paper 1

Budget Statement 6


previousnextTitle

Part II: Forward Estimates of Revenue

Estimates of the major categories of revenue, for 1999-2000 to 2002-03, are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Forward Estimates of Revenue

    1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
Estimate
$b
Change on
1998-99
%

Estimate
$b
Change on
1999-00
%
Estimate
$b
Change on
2000-01
%
Estimate
$b
Change on
2001-02
%
Individuals Tax 81.1 4.9 71.4 -12.0 77.9 9.1 82.4 5.9
     Per cent of GDP 13.1   10.9   11.2   11.1  
Other Income Tax 28.9 7.8 39.7 37.5 36.4 -8.5 38.7 6.6
     Per cent of GDP 4.7   6.0   5.2   5.2  
Total Income Tax 110.0 5.7 111.1 1.0 114.2 2.8 121.2 6.1
     Per cent of GDP 17.7   16.9   16.4   16.4  
Indirect Tax 32.0 3.5 22.1 -30.8 22.0 -0.7 23.1 5.0
     Per cent of GDP 5.2   3.4   3.2   3.1  
Total Tax(a) 147.8 4.9 139.2 -5.8 142.5 2.3 150.7 5.8
     Per cent of GDP 23.8   21.2   20.4   20.4  
Non-Tax Revenue 15.0 20.4 11.3 -25.1 11.3 0.2 12.3 9.3
     Per cent of GDP 2.4   1.7   1.6   1.7  
TOTAL REVENUE 162.8 6.2 150.5 -7.6 153.8 2.2 163.1 6.1
     Per cent of GDP 26.3   22.9   22.1   22.1  

  1. Includes Other Taxes, Fees and Fines.

The revenue projections have been made on the conventional assumption of no change in current policy. Therefore, the forward estimates of revenue are principally affected by projected growth in economic parameters and policy measures contained in this and previous budgets, including A New Tax System.

Taxation revenue generally mirrors economic activity during periods of fairly steady economic growth (as depicted by the economic projections in this Budget), but tends to swing more sharply during periods of economic contraction and expansion and more sharply than nominal GDP growth. The forward revenue estimates are also particularly susceptible to changes in the extent of tax minimisation and avoidance action by taxpayers.

Total revenue as a proportion of GDP is expected to:

Individuals tax falls in 2000-01 due to the introduction of lower personal tax rates in that year. Other income tax rises sharply in 2000-01 before falling in 2001-02. This is a result of the move to the new company tax payment arrangements, which result in some companies being assessed under both the new and existing arrangements in 2000-01. This results in higher accrued revenue in that year, even though companies will be allowed to defer payment of part of their liability to later years.

Indirect tax falls sharply in 2000-01 as a result of the abolition of WST. Revenue from the GST is not reported as the Commonwealth will be collecting this tax on an agency basis for the States and Territories.

Table 8 reconciles revenue estimates at the time of the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook 1998-99 (1998-99 MYEFO) and the 1999-2000 Budget in terms of policy decisions and parameter and other variations.

Table 8: Reconciliation of Revenue Estimates

  1998-99
$m
1999-00
$m
2000-01
$m
2001-02
$m
Revenue at 1998-99 MYEFO(a) 153224 158492 151258 154327
Changes from MYEFO to 1999-2000 Budget        
     Effect of policy decisions -118 -124 -121 -21
     Effect of parameter and other variations 243 4459 -642 -546
Total variations 125 4336 -764 -568
Revenue at 1999-2000 Budget 153349 162828 150494 153759

  1. Estimates of revenue at the 1998-99 MYEFO are based on accrual data collected for the 1999-2000 Budget.


previous next Up Title Contents